Huff v. BIOMET, INC.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Joe v. Lebow (1996), Gazarkiewicz v. Town of Kingsford Heights (2004)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co. · 152 Ind. App. 365 - Hunter v. Hunter · Indiana Department of Human Services v. Firth · Biberstine v. New York Blower Co. · Pugh's IGA, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Every person, firm, corporation, limited lability company, or association, their trustees, lessees, or receivers appointed by any court, doing business in Indiana, shall pay each employee at least semimonthly or biweekly, if requested, the amount due the employee. The payment shall be made in lawful money of the United States, by negotiable check, draft, or money order, or by electronic transfer to the financial institution designated by the employee. Any contract in violation of this subsection is void."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'(1) [employees'] wages must be paid in money; (2) if requested, employers must pay employees semi-monthly or biweekly; and (3) employees, upon separation from employment, must be paid the amount due them at their next and usual payday (unless their whereabouts are unknown)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a determinate sum with which the defendant was entrusted to apply to a certain purpose.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.