Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 654 N.E.2d 856 - Bell v. State

Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2015

6 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · Lewandowski v. State · 166 Ind. App. 395 - Dowdell v. State · Floyd v. State · Parsley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant who is sentenced after the effective date of a statute providing for more lenient sentencing is entitled to be sentenced pursuant to that statute rather than the sentencing statute in effect at the time of the commission or conviction of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.