Marks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. State · Kitchens v. State · Roulston v. State · Atnip v. State · Lewis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We believe that under the circumstances of this case, the rape of N. at Christmas was the culmination of the September-October incident. The prior incident involved fondling of N.-, and appellant learned that N. would not tell her mother if appellant asked her to remain silent. Under these circumstances, we find that this evidence ‘tends to support the conclusion that there was a plan or system which embraced that and the crime for which [appellant was] charged,’ in that ‘the [prior] crime [was] committed to prepare the way for another and the commission of the second crime [was] made to depend on the first.’ (Citations Omitted)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“[Wjhen a specific objection is made at trial to the admission of evidence, no different objection will be considered on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fitchen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.