Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

654 So. 2d 1019

Docket 94-3045.

Taylor v. Perrin

Lewis TAYLOR, Jr., Appellant, v. Everett I. PERRIN, Jr., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-05-12

Relies on Campbell v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. · Guess v. Barton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-05-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2016

5 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Lewis Taylor, Jr., appellant, pro se.

¶2No appearance for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Taylor appeals an order summarily denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which stated that "the petition on its face has failed to state any cause upon which relief may be granted." In our review, we must assume the allegations of the habeas petition are true. See Guess v. Barton,599 So.2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In this case the habeas petition alleges that administrative remedies have been exhausted and claims due process and double jeopardy violations in regard to Taylor's confinement to Close Management. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Roy v. Dugger, 592 So.2d 1235 *1020 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Guess v. Barton, supra.

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

/654/so2d/1019 · .json · Public domain