Barry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Branam v. State · Short v. State · Barry v. State · 584 So. 2d 156 - Zamora v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where statutory minimum mandatory sentences preclude sentencing within the permitted guidelines, the trial court, in order to come as close to the permitted guidelines range as possible, must impose either concurrent or consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Zamora v. State, 584 So.2d 156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). See also Branam v. State, 554 So.2d 512 (Fla.1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Darrisaw v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.