¶1Earl Gipson appeals from Ms conviction and sentence for battery on a law enforcement officer. Gipson’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After an independent review of the record and law, we see no error affecting his conviction and, therefore, affirm. However, we strike the second sentence of probation condition # 4 and the first sentence of probation condition # 7, neither of which were orally pronounced at sentencing. See Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
654 So. 2d 1258
Gipson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 12, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-05-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1997
1 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California · Emond v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-05-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →