¶1The consecutive habitual offender sentences imposed in Counts I and II are impermissible under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), therefore we REVERSE and REMAND for resentenc-ing on those two counts. Resentencing may include restructuring to provide for a proba*302tionary period, see Jordan v. State, 568 So.2d 1011 (Fla.App. 1 Dist.1990).
654 So. 2d 301
Hemphill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 5, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-05-05
Relies on Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · Jordan v. State
Decided 1995-05-05