Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

654 So. 2d 671

Perry & Co. v. FIRST SECURITY INS.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-05-17

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2008

6 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“A trial court has wide discretion to grant or deny a temporary injunction and an appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of such discretion unless the party challenging the grant or denial clearly shows an abuse of that discretion.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Briceno v. BRYDEN INVESTMENTS, LTD.

Relies on 646 So. 2d 215 - 3299 N. Federal Hwy. v. BROWARD CTY. COM'RS · TJR Holding Co. v. Alachua County · 593 So. 2d 1125 - EMP. BEN. PLANS, INC. v. Radice Corporate Ctr. I, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-05-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PERRY & CO. and Equity Premium Finance Co., Appellants,
v.
FIRST SECURITY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Associated Insurance Brokers, Inc., AIB Insurance Underwriters, Inc., and Union American Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 94-1941.

¶1District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 17, 1995.

¶2Carlos Lidsky, Hialeah and Leo Bueno, Miami, for appellants.

¶3A.J. Barranco & Associates and Sam Daniels and Norma G. Barnett, Miami, for appellees.

¶4Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6An appellant who challenges the denial of a temporary injunction has a heavy burden. 3299 N. Fed. Highway, Inc. v. Broward County Bd. of Comm'rs,646 So.2d 215, 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). A trial court has wide discretion to grant or deny a temporary injunction and an appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of such discretion unless the party challenging the grant or denial clearly shows an abuse of that discretion. T.J.R. Holding Co. v. Alachua County,617 So.2d 798, 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). In the instant case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's motion for a temporary injunction where the prerequisites for the injunction were not met. Cf. Employee Benefit Plans, Inc. v. Radice Corporate Ctr. I, Inc.,593 So.2d 1125, 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) ("The law in this state is clear that ... a temporary injunction will not issue unless the movant can meet the requirements.").

¶7Affirmed.

/654/so2d/671 · .json · Public domain