Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 654 So. 2d 908 - Pinacle v. State

654 So. 2d 908 - Pinacle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · In Re Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 · 621 So. 2d 430 - Krajewski v. State · 608 So. 2d 528 - Perryman v. State · Hood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile we agree that the objection was not as specific as it might have been, we find that it was nonetheless sufficient to preserve the Karchesky issue for our review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.