Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 A2D 827 - Hall v. State

Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jhh Sch v. J O'Hara · Gibson v. Gillespie · Compaq Computer Corp. v. Horton · Hannigan v. Italo Petroleum Corp. of America · Hamilton v. Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of champerty 'is based upon the ground that no encouragement should be given to litigation by the introduction of a party to enforce those rights which the owners are not disposed to prosecute. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “between the owner of a claim and a volunteer that the latter may take the claim and collect it, dividing the proceeds with the owner, if they prevail; the champertor to carry on the suit at his own expense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “those who have no legal interest in the subject matter of the dispute; those who have no relation to either of the parties to the dispute ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.