Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 F.2d 51 - United States v. Greer

United States v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis

655 F.2d 51 · 1981

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State (1989), United States v. Varella (1982)

19 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

260198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Dillingham v. United States · United States v. Avalos · United States v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) duration; (2) reason for the delay; (3) defendant's assertion of the right; and (4) prejudice caused by the delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “between the 10 1/2 month delay not considered presumptively prejudicial in United States v. Maizumi, 526 F.2d 848 (5th Cir.1976), and the 15-month delay considered presumptively prejudicial in United States v. Avalos, 541 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir.1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(i) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (ii) to minimize anxiety and concern of the accused; and (iii) to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.