Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 F.2d 920 - United States v. Doe

United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

655 F.2d 920 · 1980

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
5
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), Cox v. Summa Corp. (1985)

47 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

3101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. Zerbst · Roe v. Wade · Williams v. People of State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “harassment, injury, ridicule or personal embarrassment”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1)whether the original judge could reasonably be expected to put out of his mind previously expressed views or findings that were subsequently found to be erroneous; (2) whether reassignment is advisable to preserve the appearance of justice; and (3) whether reassignment would entail waste or duplication of effort out of proportion to the gain realized in preserving the appearance of fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If it appears that a defendant ... is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses or of defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts, grant a severance of defendants or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.