Katz v. Gerardi’s Empirical Analysis
655 F.3d 1212 · 2011
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust · Haytian Republic · Brenda Curtis Alvin Williamson v. Citibank Na Citicorp North America Inc Citicorp Securities
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the efficient and comprehensive disposition of cases.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he test for claim splitting is not whether there is finality of judgment, but whether the first suit, assuming it were final, would preclude the second suit.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]laintiffs have no right to maintain two actions on the same subject in the same court, against the same defendant at the same time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.