Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 F.3d 1223 - Valle v. Singer

Valle v. Singer’s Empirical Analysis

655 F.3d 1223 · 2011

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Baze v. Rees · Davis v. United States · Hill v. McDonough · Caso v. United States · Smith v. Gte Corporation Gte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because [the defendant] cannot establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his complaint, we deny [his] motion for a stay of execution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) he has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) he will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction issues; (3) the stay would not substantially harm the other litigant; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[The defendant] has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his claims. Therefore, the Court denies [his] motion for a stay of execution in this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.