Oviedo v. Hallbauer’s Empirical Analysis
655 F.3d 419 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2024
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009)
Relies on Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno · Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. · Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Des Moines Navigation Co v. Iowa Homestead Co · Baker v. Goldsmith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the state court judgment [at the time of removal] was no longer subject to modification by the rendering court or subject to further direct appellate review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.