Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 F.3d 75 - EMC Corp. v. Arturi

EMC Corp. v. Arturi’s Empirical Analysis

655 F.3d 75 · 2011

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on All Stainless, Inc. v. Colby · 14 Mass. App. Ct. 706 - Sentry Insurance v. Firnstein · Phoung Luc v. Wyndham Management Corp. · A-Copy, Inc. v. Michaelson · McClure v. Galvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the period of restraint has expired ... specific relief is inappropriate and the injured party is left to his damages remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even when the delay was substantially caused by the time consumed in legal appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.