In Re Hops Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2008
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 9 U.S.C. § 201 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the circumstances, the Court does not now find either (a) the [English] arbi tration proceedings will be so “gravely difficult or inconvenient,” or (b) the operation of the choice of forum and' choice-of-law provisions will prohibit pursuit of plaintiffs antitrust claims, as to support a court order not enforcing the parties’ arbitration agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any dispute arising out of or relating to this agreement, including its interpretation, validity, scope and enforceability, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by arbitration”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]greement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.