Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 FSUPP 336 - Kaplan v. Shapiro

Kaplan v. Shapiro’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Daniel · Brewer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts espousing a theory of horizontal commonality require plaintiff[s] to show a pooling of the investors' interests in order to establish a common enterprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fortunes of each investor in a pool of investors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.