Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 P2D 1040 - Amarex, Inc. v. Baker

Amarex, Inc. v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co. (1984), Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co. (1989)

39 state decisions

16019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cabell v. City of Cottage Grove · Ginn v. Knight · State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. · El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission · Southwestern Natural Gas Co. v. Vernor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he continuous operation in the drilling of a well, during which the operator lost the initial hole, skidded the rig six feet from the initial hole and drilled to a depth of 416.25 feet, and continued drilling operations is merely an incident in the drilling of the well and does not constitute a new well. So long as the surface location of the borehole is not otherwise so precisely defined and limited, the drilling of a well consists of penetrating the earth from the surface to the prescribed depth with drilling equipment. Minor vertical or horizontal variations do not convert the operation to a new well, whether such variations occur at the surface of the earth or beneath it. The finding of the Commission that a new well was commenced was therefore not supported by substantial evidence and must be reversed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Assuming arguendo that the Legislature could constitutionally confer exclusive jurisdiction in the Corporation Commission to determine the proper costs in the event of a dispute in the drilling and development of a pooled oil and gas drilling unit, § 87.1(e) may not be construed as conferring or a Legislative attempt to confer, such exclusive jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The nature of a pleading filed in a cause is determined by the subject matter thereof, and by the relief the Court is authorized to grant under it, and not by the title given it by the pleader.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.