State v. Studham’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Singer v. United States · United States v. Jamar · Corbett v. Bordenkircher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an accused is guaranteed a right [to] trial by jury, neither the state nor the federal constitution guarantees him a right to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Greenwood“clearly demonstrate[ ] an invasion of due process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Greenwood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.