¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
¶3SHAW, Judge.
¶4We have for review Huffine v. State, 648 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), wherein the district court certified:
Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad?
¶5We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
¶6We recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S186, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Huffine on this issue.
¶7It is so ordered.
¶8GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
¶9KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
¶10KOGAN, J., specially concurring.
¶11Subject to the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S186, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995) (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with the majority.