Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 SO2D 1115 - State v. Mozo

State v. Mozo’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Glinton (1998), 667 So. 2d 343 - State v. Setzler (1995)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Carey v. Brown · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · United States v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e adhere to the settled principle of constitutional law that courts should endeavor to implement the legislative intent of statutes and avoid constitutional issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he actual `interception' of a communication occurs not where such is ultimately heard or recorded but where the communication originates.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation and does not mean any public oral communication uttered at a public meeting or any electronic communication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.