Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2012
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · Curry v. Brown · State v. Townsend · 485 So. 2d 1279 - The Florida Bar v. Greene
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e decline to enunciate a blanket rule that no conviction can stand based solely on hearsay testimony.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a trial court's failure to make sufficient findings under section 90.803(23) in and of itself does not constitute fundamental error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hanks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.