Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

655 So. 2d 213

Docket No. 95-1505.

Blanco v. Roth

Vincent BLANCO, Petitioner, v. Richard ROTH, Sheriff, Monroe County, Etc., Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-05-26

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1999

3 state decisions

Relies on 471 So. 2d 1274 - Bowen v. Bowen · Compagnoni v. Compagnoni

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-05-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Vincent Blanco, in pro. per.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Elliot B. Kula, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

¶3Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Vincent Blanco petitions this court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. We grant his petition and direct that he be discharged from incarceration, as there is no evidentiary support for the trial court's finding that Blanco has the present ability to pay the $5,000 purge condition in the contempt order relating to his child support arrearages. See Bowen v. Bowen,471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985); Compagnoni v. Compagnoni,619 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

¶6Petition granted.

/655/so2d/213 · .json · Public domain