¶1Appellant claims that the trial court imper-missibly ordered restitution upon resentenc-ing following remand from this court, where no restitution was imposed at the original sentencing. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of restitution. See Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied 591 So.2d 184 (Fla.1991); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
655 So. 2d 238
Brooks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 6, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-06-06
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1998
2 state decisions
Relies on 591 So. 2d 178 - Florida Bar re Corbin · State v. Iglesias · Jones v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-06-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →