Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

655 So. 2d 250

Hodge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-06-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2012

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The state properly concedes that the guidelines scoresheet was erroneously calculated due to an error in the severity ranking of grand theft, which requires remand for correction and a new sentencing using the correctly calculated scoresheet. We also agree that conditions “H” and “L” are special conditions that would require oral pronouncement. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed but we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

¶2Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/655/so2d/250 · .json · Public domain