State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2018
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · Witt v. State · 561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State · Hance v. Georgia · Ree v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requirement did not come from Smith at all. We eschewed this requirement in Smith for good reason, as explained below. Our decision in Smith was not limited to the retrospective application of Ree . Rather, we held that every decision of this Court announcing a new rule of law must be given retrospective application in all”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. State“[W]e now hold that Ree shall apply to all cases not yet final when mandate issued after rehearing in Ree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.