Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 655 SW2D 164 - McKee v. McKee

McKee v. McKee’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2017

6 state decisions

301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spalding v. Spalding · Phillips v. Webster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Alimony in gross, or “lump-sum alimony,” is fundamentally the award of a definite sum of money; and if the sum is payable in instalments [sic] the payments run for a definite length of time. The sum is payable in full, regardless of future events such as the death of the husband or the remarriage of the wife.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The determining factor in distinguishing whether alimony is in futuro or in solido is the definiteness or indefiniteness of the amount ordered to be paid.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.