Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

655 S.W.2d 208

Burkhalter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · decided 1983-06-29

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2006

5 state decisions

Relies on Ford v. State · Burkhalter v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted murder and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for ten years. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in a published opinion delivered by the Court of *209Appeals, Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi [13th] 1982).

¶3It now appears that the decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.Cr.App.R. 304(k); Art. 44.45(b)(6) and (7), V.A.C.C.P. See Hanna v. State, 632 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

¶4The appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., dissent.
/655/sw2d/208 · .json · Public domain