Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 A2D 288 - Williams v. United States

Williams v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2011

4 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blackledge v. Allison · Henderson v. Morgan · United States v. Adams · Bettis v. United States · Gooding v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere may be made only before sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended; but to correct manifest injustice, the Court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A guilty plea may be withdrawn after sentencing only if the defendant affirmatively establishes that the trial court’s acceptance of [his or] her plea was manifestly unjust, and that the plea proceeding was fundamentally flawed such that there was a complete miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.