In Re Gil’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably In Re Slattery (2001), In Re Berger (1999)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Baish · 51 Md. App. 321 - State v. Jones · In Re Kennedy · Skeeter v. Commonwealth · Matter of Lieber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A lawyer shall not: ... (3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law. (4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.” 3 . DR 9-103(A) provides, in relevant part: "All funds of clients paid to a lawyer or law firm other than advances for costs and expenses shall be deposited in one or more identifiable bank accounts maintained in the state in which the law office is situated and no funds belonging to the lawyer or law firm shall be deposited therein. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Morrell“[H]ad Respondent been convicted of felony theft, disbarment would have been automatic under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989).... As the Board observed, “[Rjespondent’s betrayal of the trust of his friend ... shows him to be so wanting in his fundamental awareness of right and wrong that his continued membership in the Bar undermines its integrity and poses a threat to future clients.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Mitrano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.