Kenyon v. Andersen’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Butler v. Richardson · 230 Cal. App. 2d 167 - Mercer v. Lemmens · 184 Cal. App. 3d 55 - C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. Cidco · Radio Webs, Inc. v. Tele-Media Corp. · Hood v. Hawkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is the purchase price and not the net amount to be received by [the seller] which define[s] the terms under which the right [of first refusal] could be exercised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.