Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

656 F.2d 108

Docket No. 79-1196.

Scott v. Moore

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 31, 1981.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-08-31

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1988

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Scott v. Moore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Martin W. Dies, Orange, Tex., William N. Wheat, Paul F. Waldner, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

¶2Robert Q. Keith, Arthur R. Almquist, Beaumont, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES *109CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCH-ETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/656/f2d/108 · .json · Public domain