Casillas v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
656 F.3d 273 · 2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Abdulai v. Ashcroft · Kumarasamy v. Attorney General of United States · Prekaj v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Madu v. U.S. Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress granted power to the courts of appeals to review final orders of removal, not the enforcement of final orders of removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Camick v. Sessions“not have jurisdiction over denials of petitions [to ICE] to stay removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Nielsen“given that the government caused the delay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.