United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
656 F.3d 375 · 2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Minnesota v. Olson · Georgia v. Randolph · United States v. Ayoub · United States v. Gross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“particular arrangement of adult co-occupants — a grandmother-in-law, mother-in-law, wife, and husband — does not fall within any recognized hierarchy.” Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted). Under this analysis, there was no recognized hierarchy among Defendant and his mother, who are both adults; therefore, Mrs. Phillips' consent would not override Defendant's objection. The Government does not dispute this. Gov’t 2d Supp. Br. at 3 (Dkt. 29) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.