Alvarez v. Chevron Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
656 F.3d 925 · 2011
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2822 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2823 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2824 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · 20 Cal. 4th 163 - Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. · 222 Cal. App. 3d 1371 - Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc. · Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLC · 169 Cal. App. 4th 116 - Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiffs’ intended disclosure remedy is designed to warn customers at the point of sale that the grade of fuel they purchase may or may not actually be delivered, regardless of its posted fuel grade. This notice would have the effect of challenging the accuracy and undermining the uniformity of federal octane labeling regulations promulgated by the FTC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the Legislature has permitted certain conduct or considered a situation and concluded no action should lie, courts may not override that determination.”); id. (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.