Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 FAPPX 694 - Mingming Li v. Loretta Lynch

Mingming Li v. Loretta Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Arkansas v. Oklahoma · Soadjede v. Ashcroft · Yu Zhao v. Gonzales · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.