Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 FSUPP 121 - United States v. Redovan

United States v. Redovan’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Immediato v. Rye Neck School District (1996), Rendleman v. Bowen (1988)

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 42 U.S.C. § 254E · 42 U.S.C. § 254F · 42 U.S.C. § 254I · 42 U.S.C. § 254M · 42 U.S.C. § 254O · 42 U.S.C. § 294t

Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States · Alonzo Bailey v. State of Alabama · Clyatt v. United States · United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a means to overcome a geographic maldistribution of health professionals.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is the amount the United States is entitled to recover;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “assign to an area a Corps member who has (and whose spouse, if any, has) those characteristics which are characteristics which increase the probability of the member's remaining to serve the area upon completion of his assignment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.