Jones v. Wasserman’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc. · Galindo v. Christensen · Griffith v. Jones · Breedlove v. Breedlove · Associates Financial Services Co. of Kentucky v. Knapp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party, attorney, or panelist who fails to act as required by this chapter without good cause shown is subject to mandate or appropriate sanctions upon application to the court designated in the proposed complaint as having jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Beemer v. Elskens · Adams v. Chavez“express its expert opinion as to whether or not the evidence supports the conclusion that the defendant or defendants acted or failed to act within the appropriate standards of care as charged in the complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Reck v. Knight · Rambo v. Begley“it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to demonstrate why the trial court should have been required to rule differently as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beemer v. Elskens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.