Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 NW2D 409 - Noske v. Friedberg

Noske v. Friedberg’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
5
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2024

1 district · 9 state decisions

60200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bonhiver v. Graff · Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin · 747 So. 2d 931 - Steele v. Kehoe · Stevens v. Bispham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a convicted defendant who cannot meet the standard of proving that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, there would not have been a conviction, also cannot meet the higher burden of proving by a fair preponderance of the evidence in a later malpractice action that but for counsel's negligent conduct, there would not have been a conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “invitation to bring litigation, including the attendant burden and expense placed on finite judicial resources as well as on the parties, for cases in which no justiciable controversy currently exists or may ever exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “require every convicted defendant who seeks relief from a conviction ... to also file a legal-malpractice action or risk later having the action be time-barred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.