State v. Traylor’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14131 (§ 210303 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · State v. Schwartz · State v. Pappas · Goeb v. Tharaldson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, a novel scientific technique that produces evidence to be admitted at trial must be shown to be generally accepted within the relevant scientific community, and second, the particular evidence derived from the technique and used in an individual case must have a foundation that is scientifically reliable. Put another way, the Frye-Mack standard asks first whether experts in the field widely share the view that the results of scientific testing are scientifically reliable, and second whether the laboratory conducting the tests in the individual case complied with appropriate standards and controls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bailey“importantly, there was a portion of the DNA sample at issue available for Traylor to perform his own tests, an opportunity Traylor did not pursue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bailey“[i]deally, a defendant should be provided with the actual DNA sample(s) in order to reproduce the tests”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.