State v. Casarez’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Sanwick (1986), Condemarin v. University Hospital (1989)
1 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gardner v. Florida · Townsend v. Burke · Mempa v. Rhay · Specht v. Patterson · United States v. District Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is no substantial reason for sentencing criminal defendants on the basis of confidential information ... without affording those defendants some opportunity to point .out mistakes in that information. It is essential to both the form and substance of a fair proceeding that the defendant have the right to point out errors, misinterpretations, or even to demonstrate that he is not in fact the subject of the report. Such errors are not unknown.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“at which a defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“constru[ing] statutes when possible to effectuate the legislative intent and to avoid potential constitutional conflicts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlson v. Bos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.