DANA P. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2024
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · LaRocca v. United States · Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. · Scoufos v. Fuller · Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[when construing statutes, all relevant provisions must be considered together, where possible, so that force and meaning is given to each.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If and only if the court finds the whereabouts of the parents cannot be ascertained, may notice be given by publication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonably calculated to provide knowledge of the proposed exercise of jurisdiction and an opportunity to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.