Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 P2D 269 - Lambrecht v. Bartlett

Lambrecht v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Connaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(9)(A). Any sale to not more than twenty-five persons .. during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, whether or not the seller or any purchasers are then present in this state, if: 1. the seller reasonably believes that all buyers in this state ... are purchasing for investment; 2. no commission or other remuneration is paid or given, directly or indirectly for any such solicitation or sale in this state ...; 3. no public advertising or solicitation will be used in any such solicitation or sale; and 4. a legend is placed on the certificate or other document evidencing ownership of the security, stating that the security is not registered under the act and that the security cannot be resold without being registered or qualified for an exemption under this act.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if the evidence is so clearly preponderant that it reasonably admits of but one conclusion, that the retained interest is remuneration for sales effort or that the interests are in excess of what is reason able in light of all the applicable facts and circumstances, then the disposition of the case becomes a matter of law and the trial court may grant summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is unlawful for any person to offer to sell any security in this state unless (1) it is registered under this act or (2) the security or transaction is exempted under section 401. 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.