In Re Br’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. · In re the Louisville Underwriters · Jones v. State · Chapman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an adjudication of delinquency, we construe the evidence and every inference from the evidence in favor of the juvenile court's adjudication to determine if a reasonable finder of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the juvenile committed the acts charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Mere presence at the scene of a crime is insufficient to convict one of being a party to the crime, but presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“resolve conflicts in the evidence or determine the credibility of the witnesses. Those issues are for the juvenile court to decide.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re MW
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.