In Re Rdb’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Interest of T. A. M. · 281 Ga. App. 331 - In the Interest of S. V. · In re K. W. · In Re Tam · In the Interest of P. A. T. L.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the statutory framework encourages relative placement, it is not an absolute requirement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If, upon the entering of an order terminating the parental rights of a parent, there is no parent having parental rights, the court shall first attempt to place the child with a person related to the child by blood or marriage or with a member of the child's extended family if such a person is willing and, after study by the probation officer or other person or agency designated by the court, is found by the court to be qualified to receive and care for the child, if the court determines such placement is the most appropriate for and in the best interest of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dch“authorized to consider the adverse effects of prolonged foster care in determining that continued deprivation is likely to cause serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.