State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

cited by 37 later decisions

states following

June 2017

most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 735 So. 2d 62 - State v. Williams (1999), 727 So. 2d 630 - State v. Freeman (1998)

37 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Oliveaux · State v. Dorthey · State v. Weiland · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · State v. Mims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Snavely
“... although it appears that the trial court imposed the enhanced sentence based on one count and not on all counts, that assumption cannot be stated with certainty. See State v. McIntyre, supra . Furthermore, because two of the counts arose from a single criminal episode, the defendant could not have been sentenced as a multiple offender on all counts. State ex rel. Porter v. Butler, 573 So.2d 1106, 1108 (La.1991). Convictions on more than one count entered on the same date should be treated as one conviction for purposes of the habitual offender statute. Id. Therefore, the enhanced sentence imposed must be vacated and the case remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Cloud · 677 So. 2d 518 - State v. Soileau
“at the felony trial. While our Code of Evidence prohibits the use of evidence of other crimes or wrongful acts to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith, such evidence is admissible”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Johnson · 685 So. 2d 210 - State v. Foret

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.