656 So. 2d 1253 - Harvey v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 759 So. 2d 650 - Thompson v. State (2000), Peede v. State (1999)
2 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Yagow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]ssues that could have been, but were not, raised on direct appeal are not cognizable through collateral attack.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Power v. State · Moore v. State“It is also not appropriate to use a different argument to relitigate the same issue.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because [Cooper] did not object to these instructions or request legally sufficient alternative instructions, these claims are procedurally barred. Further, ... counsel cannot be deemed ineffective under the test set out in Strickland for failing to object to these instructions when this Court had previously upheld the validity of these instructions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.