Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 SO2D 191 - Reid v. State

Reid v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2017

8 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · Taylor v. State · 491 So. 2d 1120 - Murray v. State · 434 So. 2d 325 - State v. Sykes · Gonzalez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The error in the case at bar was fundamental—as it was in Brown [v. State, 550 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)] and Arline —because it simply did not involve a jury instruction that may have misled the jury, as in Murray , but, in fact, it permitted the defendant's conviction of a nonexistent crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant may be convicted of attempted manslaughter if there is proof that the defendant had the requisite intent to commit an unlawful act; however, there is no crime of attempted manslaughter by culpable negligence. Taylor v. State, 444 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1983).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the trial court committed fundamental error by giving a jury instruction that permitted ... convict[ion of a] ... nonexistent crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.