Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 SO2D 225 - Nahar v. Nahar

Nahar v. Nahar’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2014

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

70199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hilton v. Guyot · Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield · State of Texas v. State of Florida · Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp. · 581 So. 2d 162 - Lott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny foreign decree should be recognized as a valid judgment, and thus be entitled to comity, where the parties have been given notice and the opportunity to be heard, where the foreign court had original jurisdiction and where the foreign decree does not offend the public policy of the State of Florida.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While [the decedent’s] personal and intangible property may be governed by the judgment of the Aruba court, the Miami real estate may be subject to a different result. We remand this matter to the [circuit] court to resolve any issues regarding the disposition of the Miami real estate in the first instance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Turning, then, to the applicable Florida conflict-of-laws rule, it is established in Florida, as well as throughout the country, that the disposition of a joint bank account, ... is governed by the law of the situs of the account, regardless of the domicile of any party to the account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.